Did you know that "jury nullification" allows a jury to acquit a defendant they believe is technically guilty but doesn't deserve punishment? This occurs when jurors disagree with the law or its application. It's a powerful, if controversial, form of civil disobedience within the legal system, highlighting the complex interplay between law and moral judgment. Most legal systems don't formally recognize this power, but it persists as an unspoken right of the jury. What's your view on this? Share an interesting legal fact or opinion you have!